Southern Strategy

wallace_button1.gif

If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.

Any time anybody does anything that in any way pulls this campaign down and says let’s address reality and the problems we’re facing in this world, you’re accused of being racist, so you have to shut up, Ferraro said. “Racism works in two different directions. I really think they’re attacking me because I’m white. How’s that?

– Geraldine Ferraro, Hillary Clinton fund raiser and supporter

This vile set of statements suggests that Hillary Clinton is now following the advice of Rush Limbaugh and employing the Southern Strategy. She seems to believe that by defining Sen. Obama as the black candidate she can marginalize him in the eyes of white voters, and continue the long tradition of gaining political power by pitting one race against another.

Clinton’s less then convincing condemnation of Ferraro, and her attempt to suggest that both campaigns are equally responsible for such disgusting remarks are tactics and rhetoric we would expect from the worst Rovian campaigns:

I do not agree with that. It is regrettable that any of our supporters on both sides, because we’ve both had that experience, say things that kind of veer off into the personal.

– Hillary Clinton

The strategy seems designed to split the traditional democratic alliances and scare the popular vote to come out en masse for Clinton in Pennsylvania. Her plan seems to revolve around gaining enough of the popular vote to force a convention showdown with Obama. With enough of the popular vote, and some sense of momentum, she may be able to get enough super-delegates to hold the nomination through a second round of voting — which would release pledged delegates from their candidates. In an extended convention battle Hillary Clinton would be able to pursue any and all delegates. At this point, this seems the only logical way for her to receive the nomination.

This strategy, however, will destroy the democratic party for years to come. It will alienate the vast number of young voters who have been inspired by Sen. Obama and will drive away grassroot supporters who will see such a nomination as a continuation of the chicanery of the last eight years. As of this evening dozens of people I’ve spoken with, most of them staunch democrats, have said they will not vote for Hillary Clinton if she is the nominee in November.

The Clinton campaign seems bent upon crippling the party for her own aggrandizement. It is this attitude of hubris which has led us to the folly of Iraq, the loss of international esteem, and the depressive state of our economy. I am sure that Hillary Clinton sees herself as the savior of both the party and the nation — so much more the pity, for her methods are doomed to destroy that which she seeks.

One Comment

  1. Posted May 30, 2008 at 16:41 | Permalink

    Damn, that’s just one of the best posts I’ve read on this subject period. Succinct as well, a quality I’ve lost recently. I agree completely, Hillary will stop at nothing and will destroy the Party if necessary. Talk about “Crashing the Party”, and that was Nader’s line, eh?

    The generational lines are startling as revealed in this year’s race, stunningly so. The younger people who have been inspired by the Obama campaign are so similar to my first year of voter eligibility, I turned 18 just several months before being able to vote Bill Clinton into office. We felt we made a difference, and I still feel much more akin to that group than my elders who are seeing in Hillary some great hope for vindication of the struggle for women’s rights. I simply see someone who has seen the 08 Dem. nomination as hers for years now and on the verge of a serious temper tantrum.

    I’ll click the Limbaugh link in a minute, but I listened to him a few weeks ago for the one segment I could stand, and he was actually extolling the career and determination of Hillary Clinton and declaring that the Dem. Party has now destroyed feminism and proven its sexism in its “treatment of elevating Obama, the man, over a hard working woman”, this from the man who coined the word “feminazi”. OK, not word.

    Speaking of coining a word, I landed on your site after seeing your comment at Sadly, No!:
    “Funny how assholery can transcend communities. . . .”
    “Assholery” is perhaps now my favorite new word. Right on, and nice to meet you.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.