Can You Here Me Now!

_40567953_gall_iraqhomeapok.jpg

I had just written the previous post, when I received an e-mail revealing that Ted (tubes) Stevens is protecting telecom profits at the expense of troop moral:

The Stevens bill not only proposes to scuttle network neutrality rules but also undermines key policies designed to insure community influence over how broadband networks serve the public interest–including the ability of American soldiers stationed overseas to phone home. In a section titled “War on Terror,” instead of legislation that insures maximum freedom of expression, the telecom rewrite thinks first about protecting corporate cash flow. Lawmakers could have ordered the FCC to insure that members of the military have unlimited free calls, but the Stevens bill actually prohibits the FCC from regulating any rates to do so. It simply requires the federal government to promote a “reduction of such costs” by cutting taxes or fees on phone service.

Not only is Stevens dedicated to removing consumer choice, and free speech from the Internet, he is also all for the telecom consortiums financially raping our military and its’ soldiers. Man, is there any part of this guy’s soul that hasn’t been sold off.

Contact your representatives today and as them to oppose this bill

This entry was posted by steve on Wednesday, September 20th, 2006 at 8:37 pm and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

No Comments

Be the first to comment on this entry.

Have your say

Fields in bold are required. Email addresses are never published or distributed.

Some HTML code is allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
URIs must be fully qualified (eg: http://www.domainname.com) and all tags must be properly closed.

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted.

Please keep comments relevant. Off-topic, offensive or inappropriate comments may be edited or removed.

  1. Random Quote

    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
    Epicurus
  2. Tag Cloud

  3. RSS ONI News

  4. Meta

  5. bandwidth provided by onShore